Noel just said a balance patch is a 'good idea' on Twitter

Just shooting the breeze

  • Since this topic has fallen to this state of discord, I will move it over to off topic and social where is can rot in peace.
    Decent memes Z.
    "Nobody exists on purpose. Nobody belongs anywhere. We're all going to die. Come watch TV."
    User avatar
    janitorialduties
     
    Posts: 550
    Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2015 1:27 pm
    Location: Idaho- USA


  • tw2000x wrote:
    topkilla wrote:
    tw2000 wrote:
    Paper scissors rock is not balanced because a butterfly flapping its wings in Asia could cause wind patterns in Texas to affect what people would decide to play. And yes, the imbalance might be tiny, but it exists.


    I can't be bothered to reply when you have a statement like this...

    (1) It's 'Rock Paper Scissors'.
    (2) Rock beats Scissors beats Paper beats Rock. - You can't get a more perfectly balanced game than that.

    (Apart from the fact that you're giving me the impression that you just can't accept losses)
    1. Its paper scissors rock in my country, see here in the 4th paragraph in the parenthesis. And yes, I do live in NZ, so it applies to me. The following has nothing to do with this debate:
    It's quite smart actually, when speaking from a linguistics perspective. Consider the words and the stresses of each. You get PA-per, SCI-ssors, ROCK! Where the rhythm of the phrase flows very nicely, (DUH-duh DUH-duh DUH!) and also ending on a plosive consonant sound. ROCK, PA-per, SCI-ssors! sort of doesn't have those nice things about it lol.

    2. Note the attached image. It says 'Required skills: luck, psychology.'
    Furthermore, scientists have shown that psychology actually plays quite a noticeable role. [img=http://www.iflscience.com/brain/how-win-rock-paper-scissors]Here[/img] is some proof.
    Also, there are world championships on 'rock paper scissors'....so yeahhhhh......

    About my statement, which seems completely ridiculous at first, is actually true. For example, the change in the wind pattern may cause a hurricane (as is always quoted), perhaps sending masses of rain on the roof of wherever the match of 'rock paper scissors' is being played. Unconsciously, a player may then be more inclined to play rock, since the rain hitting the roof may sound a bit like lots of rocks. The other person may take advantage of this fact and play 'paper', in which case he has a greater chance of winning, thus making this game imbalanced.



    I have no idea what this pseudo-science nonsense your talking about is. But it's silly. And youre either are stretching for some sort of 'theoretical possible' situation, or you don't understand how balance works. My point was quite simple.

    Supreme Leader TopKilla wrote:Rock beats Scissors beats Paper beats Rock.
    Supreme Leader; TopKilla
    topkilla
     
    Posts: 686
    Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2015 5:11 pm


  • topkilla wrote:I have no idea what this pseudo-science nonsense your talking about is. But it's silly. And youre either are stretching for some sort of 'theoretical possible' situation, or you don't understand how balance works. My point was quite simple.

    Lol that's just comical. You sound like an anti-vaxxer. :lol:

    Well let me now return to the original discussion by just mentioning the fact that I currently have 3 generals in the 'fractal drillers' game right now. It's perfectly practical for me. I fended off a 2v1 (or to be more precise, a 1.5v1) when I only had 1 general.
    Kings aren't OP

    "Imagination is more important than knowledge"
    ----Albert Einstein
    User avatar
    tw2000
     
    Posts: 1135
    Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2015 3:52 pm
    Location: New Zealand


  • Woah! I didn't know the state of this topic was possible :o
    Kings aren't OP

    "Imagination is more important than knowledge"
    ----Albert Einstein
    User avatar
    tw2000
     
    Posts: 1135
    Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2015 3:52 pm
    Location: New Zealand


  • I'm still keeping up with this thread.

    And I'm still convinced Tw200x is topkilla in disguise
    User avatar
    bangerz
     
    Posts: 438
    Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 5:08 pm


  • tw2000 wrote:
    topkilla wrote:I have no idea what this pseudo-science nonsense your talking about is. But it's silly. And youre either are stretching for some sort of 'theoretical possible' situation, or you don't understand how balance works. My point was quite simple.

    Lol that's just comical. You sound like an anti-vaxxer. :lol:

    Well let me now return to the original discussion by just mentioning the fact that I currently have 3 generals in the 'fractal drillers' game right now. It's perfectly practical for me. I fended off a 2v1 (or to be more precise, a 1.5v1) when I only had 1 general.


    wait. but I didn't have a king - so what point does this make exactly? That generals do things?
    User avatar
    bangerz
     
    Posts: 438
    Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 5:08 pm


  • tw2000 wrote:
    topkilla wrote:I have no idea what this pseudo-science nonsense your talking about is. But it's silly. And youre either are stretching for some sort of 'theoretical possible' situation, or you don't understand how balance works. My point was quite simple.

    Lol that's just comical. You sound like an anti-vaxxer. :lol:

    Well let me now return to the original discussion by just mentioning the fact that I currently have 3 generals in the 'fractal drillers' game right now. It's perfectly practical for me. I fended off a 2v1 (or to be more precise, a 1.5v1) when I only had 1 general.



    It's funny you bring up 'Anti-vaxxers'. - Not only does it relate to literally 0% of the conversation, but, it's so Unrelated that just by Referencing it, you sound mental.

    And the best part is, by claiming that I 'sound like a anti vaxxers' while arguing with me, you've de factoed yourself as a 'pro-vaxxer'. Which is an equally zealotic demographic.

    TL:DR TW#### referenced himself is a crazy conspiracy theorist. By use of the transitive property.
    Supreme Leader; TopKilla
    topkilla
     
    Posts: 686
    Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2015 5:11 pm


  • Close this thread down.

    This has gone from balancing specialists to vaccines for god's sake.
    Don't be Haitian - R10t--

    Lolololololol Juan. Always wrecking shit. - Radioactivity

    That should sum it up.
    User avatar
    juanma206
     
    Posts: 728
    Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 8:34 am


  • juanma206 wrote:Close this thread down.

    This has gone from balancing specialists to vaccines for god's sake.

    nah keep it up this is great !
    User avatar
    bangerz
     
    Posts: 438
    Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 5:08 pm


  • topkilla wrote:
    tw2000 wrote:
    topkilla wrote:I have no idea what this pseudo-science nonsense your talking about is. But it's silly. And youre either are stretching for some sort of 'theoretical possible' situation, or you don't understand how balance works. My point was quite simple.

    Lol that's just comical. You sound like an anti-vaxxer. :lol:

    Well let me now return to the original discussion by just mentioning the fact that I currently have 3 generals in the 'fractal drillers' game right now. It's perfectly practical for me. I fended off a 2v1 (or to be more precise, a 1.5v1) when I only had 1 general.



    It's funny you bring up 'Anti-vaxxers'. - Not only does it relate to literally 0% of the conversation, but, it's so Unrelated that just by Referencing it, you sound mental.

    And the best part is, by claiming that I 'sound like a anti vaxxers' while arguing with me, you've de factoed yourself as a 'pro-vaxxer'. Which is an equally zealotic demographic.

    TL:DR TW#### referenced himself is a crazy conspiracy theorist. By use of the transitive property.

    Hahahaha well just because it has nothing to do with our current topic, the topic you brought up about no-one liking elitism has nothing to do with the king vs general thing either.

    Also pro-vaxxers are the people who know that vaccinations are there to help. antivaxxers are the zealotic demographic here, standing in the firm belief that 'parents should be able to choose what is best for their child'. But they're obviously standing in that belief because they think that vaccinations have a negative impact on people (which has been proven over and over again to be wrong). In fact, it has been shown that the more experienced a group of people is about vaccinations, the greater the consensus that vaccinations are positive.

    Wait so are you implying that you are an anti-vaxxer?
    Kings aren't OP

    "Imagination is more important than knowledge"
    ----Albert Einstein
    User avatar
    tw2000
     
    Posts: 1135
    Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2015 3:52 pm
    Location: New Zealand

PreviousNext


Return to Off topic and social




Information
  • Who is online
  • Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests
cron