Since this topic has fallen to this state of discord, I will move it over to off topic and social where is can rot in peace.
Decent memes Z.
tw2000x wrote:topkilla wrote:tw2000 wrote:
Paper scissors rock is not balanced because a butterfly flapping its wings in Asia could cause wind patterns in Texas to affect what people would decide to play. And yes, the imbalance might be tiny, but it exists.
I can't be bothered to reply when you have a statement like this...
(1) It's 'Rock Paper Scissors'.
(2) Rock beats Scissors beats Paper beats Rock. - You can't get a more perfectly balanced game than that.
(Apart from the fact that you're giving me the impression that you just can't accept losses)
1. Its paper scissors rock in my country, see here in the 4th paragraph in the parenthesis. And yes, I do live in NZ, so it applies to me. The following has nothing to do with this debate:
It's quite smart actually, when speaking from a linguistics perspective. Consider the words and the stresses of each. You get PA-per, SCI-ssors, ROCK! Where the rhythm of the phrase flows very nicely, (DUH-duh DUH-duh DUH!) and also ending on a plosive consonant sound. ROCK, PA-per, SCI-ssors! sort of doesn't have those nice things about it lol.
2. Note the attached image. It says 'Required skills: luck, psychology.'
Furthermore, scientists have shown that psychology actually plays quite a noticeable role. [img=http://www.iflscience.com/brain/how-win-rock-paper-scissors]Here[/img] is some proof.
Also, there are world championships on 'rock paper scissors'....so yeahhhhh......
About my statement, which seems completely ridiculous at first, is actually true. For example, the change in the wind pattern may cause a hurricane (as is always quoted), perhaps sending masses of rain on the roof of wherever the match of 'rock paper scissors' is being played. Unconsciously, a player may then be more inclined to play rock, since the rain hitting the roof may sound a bit like lots of rocks. The other person may take advantage of this fact and play 'paper', in which case he has a greater chance of winning, thus making this game imbalanced.
Supreme Leader TopKilla wrote:Rock beats Scissors beats Paper beats Rock.
topkilla wrote:I have no idea what this pseudo-science nonsense your talking about is. But it's silly. And youre either are stretching for some sort of 'theoretical possible' situation, or you don't understand how balance works. My point was quite simple.
tw2000 wrote:topkilla wrote:I have no idea what this pseudo-science nonsense your talking about is. But it's silly. And youre either are stretching for some sort of 'theoretical possible' situation, or you don't understand how balance works. My point was quite simple.
Lol that's just comical. You sound like an anti-vaxxer.
Well let me now return to the original discussion by just mentioning the fact that I currently have 3 generals in the 'fractal drillers' game right now. It's perfectly practical for me. I fended off a 2v1 (or to be more precise, a 1.5v1) when I only had 1 general.
tw2000 wrote:topkilla wrote:I have no idea what this pseudo-science nonsense your talking about is. But it's silly. And youre either are stretching for some sort of 'theoretical possible' situation, or you don't understand how balance works. My point was quite simple.
Lol that's just comical. You sound like an anti-vaxxer.
Well let me now return to the original discussion by just mentioning the fact that I currently have 3 generals in the 'fractal drillers' game right now. It's perfectly practical for me. I fended off a 2v1 (or to be more precise, a 1.5v1) when I only had 1 general.
juanma206 wrote:Close this thread down.
This has gone from balancing specialists to vaccines for god's sake.
topkilla wrote:tw2000 wrote:topkilla wrote:I have no idea what this pseudo-science nonsense your talking about is. But it's silly. And youre either are stretching for some sort of 'theoretical possible' situation, or you don't understand how balance works. My point was quite simple.
Lol that's just comical. You sound like an anti-vaxxer.
Well let me now return to the original discussion by just mentioning the fact that I currently have 3 generals in the 'fractal drillers' game right now. It's perfectly practical for me. I fended off a 2v1 (or to be more precise, a 1.5v1) when I only had 1 general.
It's funny you bring up 'Anti-vaxxers'. - Not only does it relate to literally 0% of the conversation, but, it's so Unrelated that just by Referencing it, you sound mental.
And the best part is, by claiming that I 'sound like a anti vaxxers' while arguing with me, you've de factoed yourself as a 'pro-vaxxer'. Which is an equally zealotic demographic.
TL:DR TW#### referenced himself is a crazy conspiracy theorist. By use of the transitive property.
Return to Off topic and social