SUBTERFUGE Forums

For those of you who didn't read the thread about cooperation in a game, and the disagreement of cheating with Fox, Aclonicy, and myself, pretty much what happened was that Fox said he plays domination with two of his friends, in a form of what we consider multi boxing. I expressed my opinion, that I found this as a form of cheating.
The only reason I bring this up is because we decided to hold a little challenge. Fox and his team are willing to play a game against three of the best forumers. Now, I don't believe I am in a position to nominate anyone, I don't think I've been around long enough. So if anyone is willing to join (or wishes to nominate someone), please tell me and I will add you.

TEAM 1:
Niverio



TEAM 2:
Fox-Alpha-One

Rules of the game:
The game will be mining, because domination would take far too long to finish.
There will be two teams, and each team will be allowed to perform any act that may constitute as suspicious of "multi boxing" (i.e. trading outposts, sharing specialists). The game will obviously be six players, and each finishing position will be worth a given number of points:
1st: 11
2nd: 10
3rd: 8
4th: 5
5th: 1
6th: 0
The reason the points are this way is to encourage all players to mine, making each lower position more detrimental to the team.
In regards to communications, any talking to the opposing team must be done in a public chat. Otherwise, talking with the team is done in a private chat between the three.
If there are any discrepancies, then please post screenshots to this thread in order to come to a conclusion democratically.
If anyone wants to recommend anything to the game, including some way to make it more interesting (wagers? no money, has to be something through the game or forums), please tell me.
Thanks guys, and Fox, I hope we can still be cool through all this. Remember everyone, this is just to have fun.

I can play if you guys want.

niverio wrote:I can play if you guys want.

I'll give Niv a nomination.

Perfect, Niverio is in

Should we not play this in a public game? Ah that would be too hard to create. If I'm needed, of people think I should, I'd gladly play to honor the forums.

nojo34 wrote:Should we not play this in a public game? Ah that would be too hard to create. If I'm needed, of people think I should, I'd gladly play to honor the forums.

Nojo I thought the same thing: make a public game with the two teams and see who comes out on top. But two things are the main issue: it will be harder to set up, and it wouldn't be fair to the poor guys who join. Plus, what if one of the teams leaks that the other three are a team, and it turns into a 7v3...
I personally think you should be in, but I said I wouldn't vote due to my minute forumer game experience. I don't want to assume who's the best and who isn't if I have barely played a full game with any of you.
If someone nominates Nojo he will be in as well.

coltspaesano wrote:If someone nominates Nojo he will be in as well.

Honesty i was flattered when you said i was a top player among us in the other thread, I consider myself a slightly above average player priding myself in my diplomacy. Problem is team games exclude diplomacy.

You should definitely (not) put me in.

I nomate V3XT. I don't think he is around anymore, but in my opinion he is the best forumer we've ever had.

V3XT would already have beaten these guys. Man he was great.