You should, most of the people that have love it and say there is a big skill difference in l1 and l2, plus the situations that can occur are amaxing

I'm more of a tactics guy. I'm always quick to see flaws in other people's actions, or use my own specialists to see how I can maximize my advantage, even if its only a small thing. But when you add lots of small things up, it ultimately helps me win the war (or at least put up a better fight than most people )
I don't really 'diplomacy' that much, I generally just trust that my ally (or allies) don't want to to go war with me (I mean, it's disadvantageous for him as well, so....) Oh and tycoons really help with diplomacy anyway so I guess tycoons are like my 'diplomat' which I use for diplomacy-ing with other people, if I need to at all...

I would define my stratagy as diplomaticly aided stratagy. I tend to focus more on fighting good wars because it is much more predictable. An ally could turn on you at any moment ruining your delicate plans however subs don't just jump out of nowhere and ruin your day. However diplomacy is helpful in and can allow you to gain a stronger control of an area that you might not have been able to before. You need a delicate balance of both but I tend to lean to the tactics side because of its predictability (but not completely predictable).

nojo34 wrote:Most of the time i try to play diplomaticlly. If i can't convnce people to have peace i use my mediocre tactics to win.

Well you didnt use much diplomacy on me , so I guess It was my bad luck


And Tw2000 , so lets see whats ur tycoons gonna do when me and kingrock attack you

roozbeh wrote:

nojo34 wrote:Most of the time i try to play diplomaticlly. If i can't convnce people to have peace i use my mediocre tactics to win.

Well you didnt use much diplomacy on me , so I guess It was my bad luck


And Tw2000 , so lets see whats ur tycoons gonna do when me and kingrock attack you

Oh yeah well I had a plan for that:
So first, I'm gonna like resign so.....
no I'm kidding