In a game of capture, it is common that a warlord takes from others. In this game,do you find it greedy to take all of a persons territorries, even though they wont win and they have not attacked you at all

emporerpineapple wrote:In a game of capture, it is common that a warlord takes from others. In this game,do you find it greedy to take all of a persons territorries, even though they wont win and they have not attacked you at all

Well greedy or not , people do it . And I love seeing people doing so .
And if someone dont actually agree , you take one or two outspots and he will give up(most of the time at least)
So its greedy , yes , but it is what it is

If they have no chance of winning, by all means go for it. Though, I think talking to them about surrendering will give the presumed attacking player a better opportunity for gifts and whatnot, assuming they are not in a preexisting alliance.

All players operate differently on this level though. As far as I am concerned, my general diplomatic stance has both saved and doomed me. I have earned second place with almost no production and a modicum of subs simply because I convinced someone not to eliminate me.

lidoh wrote:If they have no chance of winning, by all means go for it. Though, I think talking to them about surrendering will give the presumed attacking player a better opportunity for gifts and whatnot, assuming they are not in a preexisting alliance.

All players operate differently on this level though. As far as I am concerned, my general diplomatic stance has both saved and doomed me. I have earned second place with almost no production and a modicum of subs simply because I convinced someone not to eliminate me.

So you still play? Noted.