I have a group of eight that wants to 4v4 as well. Seems like eliminating the other players is a common "win" for the other team games I've seen. Only thing I'm concerned about in Domination is that the game might end early if someone gets 50% of the outposts. Hmm

it's really hard to get to 40. and of course the goal is to eliminate so no donating bases to reach 40. defeats the purpose. and by the time 1 player is close enough to 40..the game would pretty much be set and done..

we've been playing for 3 days and the top player has 15 outposts..

I think it's more luck than anything. Starting position and specialist draws defined our game.
Of course, it's easy for me to say that
But I've played another game that was 2v2, and it went basically the same way. I got junk my first draw, so my team lost.

thunder wrote:well that's between you and your mates to figure .. on our side we work pretty well together.

I think it's more luck than anything. Starting position and specialist draws defined our game.
Of course, it's easy for me to say that
But I've played another game that was 2v2, and it went basically the same way. I got junk my first draw, so my team lost.
-Road



^^ Pretty much that. This game works by being unfair because of the emphasis on democracy and the unknown. The second you take that away, luck of the specialist draw determines the outcome of the game.

specialist luck is clearly part of the game. but dont forget you guys had the upper hand in the first 2 days. You should have taken advantage.. not to mention that I did not see any gifts going between you 4. maybe i'm wrong..but on our side we supported each other with gifts and specialists exchanges.

of course like you guys said..this is not the original game anymore..but it's still fun. i find it challenging to fight 4 at the same time without worrying about an ally backstabbing you. in case we win/lose we are open for a revenge game