janitorialduties wrote:Topic Update
After sending your folks feedback, Ron sent me this email-

thanks for compiling this!

we don't have plans for a rules update at the moment (any specialist tweak counts as a rule update). if we do in the future we'll go over these in details and discuss with the community on the forums.

ron

I talk a bit to them about this email and I'll keep you updated.
]

When JD gets a response from the devs and you don't ;(

I told Ron to respond to JD and not to the baby lord.

ugh I'm giving up

bangerz wrote:ugh I'm giving up

On what? Lord Gang Bangerz?

topkilla wrote:

bangerz wrote:ugh I'm giving up

On what? Lord Gang Bangerz?

I just literally can't even right now

Update?
Kk here is my email followed by his response.

JanitorialDuties:
OH! I get it now. Whoops, I may have sent the community into a frenzy under the guise that the topic was more or less about specialist changes. I'll relay this information to them. Thanks for giving that medal, he already messaged me about it and was ecstatic.

Though I'm a bit confused- about a week ago, the mod Nojo34 posted that you where considering a balancing update. Is this no longer the case?

I apologize for jumping the gun with my last email, I misunderstood the post, as did some of the members.
I would just like to clear it up is all.

Sincerely

followed by

Ron:
we did consider it, just haven't acted on it yet, and it might take a while if it happens at all.

silverberg wrote:

krygon wrote:I don't know if this has been posted, but one thing I would like to see changed is the specialist, mainly the pirate/assassin/navigator combo that attacks with zero drillers and kills the specialists and then gets away. Even when the sub they are attacking has more drillers.

But they don't get away, if the attack sub is carrying no drillers and the attacker has no Generals at home, the pirate nav assassin kill the specialists, loses the driller fight, then gets carted away by the (probably now assassinated) defender.

Your right! My bad

As you could of guessed from my earlier post I am fairly new to the game, but I have a few of balancing questions, that I want concidered.

1. Why have anonymous games when you can invite your friends?

2. Isn't the ranking system seriously flawed if you can, again, invite your friends whom you can count on not to betray you?

3. There is talk about a paid tournament. If these options are
Implemented how would you expect people to pay to be bushwhacked by bots and People inviting their friends?

Needless to say this is a very well designed game, but it's quickly becoming unenjoyable as I and others come up against bots and RL buddies helping each other rank up.

Ranked and anonymous games should have the invite friend disabled or an cue of some sort that groups players together could be implemented. If friends want to play together you can still create a casual game and invite them.

2 cents

krygon wrote: it's quickly becoming unenjoyable as I and others come up against bots.

Bots? Are there actually bots in this game? As far as I know I have never encountered a bot..