I was only pointing that out because you say "kingmaker" in such a negative way. I personally don't see anything wrong with being a kingmaker. I have been one before, and others have acted as one for me. It's a big diplomatic part of this game. Sometimes people will give up everything to see their enemies come in anywhere but first. If sky had tried a bit harder to help, and postopned his first mine, you may not have given beige yours. If pink hadn't been the only one helping brown against a 3v1 that he had no chance of surviving, he wouldn't have gifted his stuff to him. When you have the power to pick who wins or places higher, it comes down to who you like better, and who tried their best to help you.

redqueenn wrote:I was only pointing that out because you say "kingmaker" in such a negative way. I personally don't see anything wrong with being a kingmaker. I have been one before, and others have acted as one for me. It's a big diplomatic part of this game. Sometimes people will give up everything to see their enemies come in anywhere but first. If sky had tried a bit harder to help, and postopned his first mine, you may not have given beige yours. If pink hadn't been the only one helping brown against a 3v1 that he had no chance of surviving, he wouldn't have gifted his stuff to him. When you have the power to pick who wins or places higher, it comes down to who you like better, and who tried their best to help you.

I agree with you. I put kingmaker in a negative light because it's effects were directly against me and only me. I feel it happens often to players who are the outsmart-ers not the outsmart-ees as a kinda sore loser tactic.

I think you are right in the end that both brown and I acted as kingmakers. I can only say that the intentions between the two of us were different though.

I was laughing my ass off when you were freaking out about it.