TopKilla Expedition Tournament: Finished - Conner3491 wins!

Strategy, feedback, or anything SUBTERFUGE-related

  • Game 9 is about to be over with yottawatts,entrican, and darkcitystrings taking the top 3.
    Supreme Leader; TopKilla
    topkilla
     
    Posts: 686
    Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2015 5:11 pm


  • I can't get into my game.. Will have to resign if I can't get into my game by tomorrow..
    User avatar
    bonuseverything
     
    Posts: 8
    Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2015 4:23 am
    Location: Philadelphia, PA


  • bonuseverything wrote:I can't get into my game.. Will have to resign if I can't get into my game by tomorrow..

    What do you mean you can’t get in?

    Are you talking about your invite link? All games have already started.
    Are you talking about a game you’ve already joined? If so, you will be auto-resigned after 48 hours. Why can’t you get in?
    Champinoman
     
    Posts: 276
    Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2015 2:07 pm


  • Hey, so in game 4, we had some technical issues where several of the players were unable to access the game on their devices. Most of the players had a second device they could keep playing on, but Myqpalzm didn't. I can vouch for him: he was almost definitely going to place in the game, but since he couldn't mine again due to the glitch, he was passed.
    I think he should still move on. I know we could just say, "Tough luck," but I don't think that's very fair.
    But, then again, that would throw off the structure of the tournament.
    However, didn't one of the games only start with four players? Maybe we could have only two players move on from that round, and let Myqpalzm take the third spot?
    "Can I make a suggestion that doesn't involve violence, or is this the wrong crowd for that?" -Hoban 'Wash' Washburn, Serenity
    User avatar
    roadkiehl
     
    Posts: 777
    Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2015 12:43 pm
    Location: Above It All


  • roadkiehl wrote:Hey, so in game 4, we had some technical issues where several of the players were unable to access the game on their devices. Most of the players had a second device they could keep playing on, but Myqpalzm didn't. I can vouch for him: he was almost definitely going to place in the game, but since he couldn't mine again due to the glitch, he was passed.
    I think he should still move on. I know we could just say, "Tough luck," but I don't think that's very fair.
    But, then again, that would throw off the structure of the tournament.
    However, didn't one of the games only start with four players? Maybe we could have only two players move on from that round, and let Myqpalzm take the third spot?


    Thank you for the vouch, RoadKiehl! I really appreciate it, really.

    I think he made some points there, about the 4-player match. What do you think, TopKilla and everyone here?

    EDIT: Sorry, name typo.
    Hi
    User avatar
    myqpalzm
     
    Posts: 77
    Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2015 4:32 am


  • myqpalzm wrote:
    roadkiehl wrote:Hey, so in game 4, we had some technical issues where several of the players were unable to access the game on their devices. Most of the players had a second device they could keep playing on, but Myqpalzm didn't. I can vouch for him: he was almost definitely going to place in the game, but since he couldn't mine again due to the glitch, he was passed.
    I think he should still move on. I know we could just say, "Tough luck," but I don't think that's very fair.
    But, then again, that would throw off the structure of the tournament.
    However, didn't one of the games only start with four players? Maybe we could have only two players move on from that round, and let Myqpalzm take the third spot?


    Thank you for the vouch, RoadKiehl! I really appreciate it, really.

    I think he made some points there, about the 4-player match. What do you think, TopKilla and everyone here?

    EDIT: Sorry, name typo.



    Unfortunately, there is no fair option.

    If he's allowed to move on, then it's unfair to everyone. If he isn't allow to move on, its not fair to just the players in your game.

    Therefore, the only way myqpalzm can move on is if someone in Game 3's top 3 comes out and says that myqalzm would have without a doubt, been in the top 3 and prevented them from doing so. And is willing to give up their position for him in round two. And then approval by 5/7 of your teams players in agreement.
    Supreme Leader; TopKilla
    topkilla
     
    Posts: 686
    Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2015 5:11 pm


  • Game 1 is down to 4 players. We've worked together to take down player #5 and #6, and to give everyone a chance to recover we've agreed on a game-wide 24 hour truce. Very interesting, haven't had this in a game before.

    The remaining players are, in alphabetical order:
    Alts
    Karas
    Kcnkcn
    Stefan

    [Edit - removed my opinion on the situation in games 3 and 4 after I noticed that TopKilla commented on it.]
    stefan
     
    Posts: 487
    Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2015 12:47 pm


  • In response to Topkillas reply to Myqpalzm, I agree that it's unfortunate and he most likely should not advance. Looking at the current intelligence panel, the only one he could have outmined was brown, gis4gamer, and they had an alliance. Also, looking back at his drillers numbers and my positioning, I don't think he could have affected my neptunium Production in any meaningful manner in the past 48 hours.

    If it were the case that he was swarming all over me or another player and the fact that he was afk for that period of time affected his attacks, I would agree to some extant that it turned out unfair. However, that's not the case and unless he had plans and the ability to overthrow gis4gamer, which may be possible, then he would not have placed in the top 3.
    thestash
     
    Posts: 80
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2015 12:16 pm


  • thestash wrote:In response to Topkillas reply to Myqpalzm, I agree that it's unfortunate and he most likely should not advance. Looking at the current intelligence panel, the only one he could have outmined was brown, gis4gamer, and they had an alliance. Also, looking back at his drillers numbers and my positioning, I don't think he could have affected my neptunium Production in any meaningful manner in the past 48 hours.

    If it were the case that he was swarming all over me or another player and the fact that he was afk for that period of time affected his attacks, I would agree to some extant that it turned out unfair. However, that's not the case and unless he had plans and the ability to overthrow gis4gamer, which may be possible, then he would not have placed in the top 3.


    Like I said in many of my other posts in the forums, I have many things in store that could make me victorious. It's also not my fault that I'm inactive. I still can't access my current game, and I've been auto-resigned.

    But I understand. I know it's tough luck if I somehow could make it to round 2. Good luck to everyone that advances to round 2! I'll wait (im)patiently for the second tournament! I also hope that no weird bugs and glitches shows up again....
    Hi
    User avatar
    myqpalzm
     
    Posts: 77
    Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2015 4:32 am


  • Game 7 still looks to be a long game. The game started with a rocky beginning, with almost all 6 players going to war.
    Each player will soon have their mines going along, but as of now, game is predicted to end in 10 days, so more likely 5 days.
    Reporting from the Bridge
    User avatar
    pandasecret
     
    Posts: 648
    Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2015 3:53 am

PreviousNext


Return to General




Information
  • Who is online
  • Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests