Sat Nov 04, 2017 3:38 am
roozbeh wrote:have more than 40 games
Sat Nov 04, 2017 5:44 am
Sat Nov 04, 2017 7:19 am
nautiusmaximus wrote:If we wanted to get really court like we could do 3 judge rulings that are bound by precedent, that is to say must follow the law as it is laid forth in our previous rulings. The only way to overturn an old decision is by an en banc hearing, all 5 judges sitting and hearing the case together.
Sat Nov 04, 2017 9:18 am
blobbydude wrote:
Oh yeah? Well I'm a literalism, and I want to know what was intended when Ron and Noel made the game. Who cares about whatever decisions happened after that.
Sat Nov 04, 2017 1:27 pm
nautiusmaximus wrote:blobbydude wrote:
Oh yeah? Well I'm a literalism, and I want to know what was intended when Ron and Noel made the game. Who cares about whatever decisions happened after that.
I mean yea... you can be a moron if you want. I was just pointing out a logical way of doing things.
Sat Nov 04, 2017 1:45 pm
mathwhiz9 wrote:roozbeh wrote:have more than 40 games
I believe I qualify, and am willing to participate.
Sat Nov 04, 2017 4:41 pm
niverio wrote:mathwhiz9 wrote:roozbeh wrote:have more than 40 games
I believe I qualify, and am willing to participate.
No math you should play 30 more.
Sun Nov 05, 2017 5:51 am