Thanks for calling the idea as "legitimate" move.
I am one of them in "the game", and probably will take the position 6th. Idea came from me - thanks for calling it as a strategy. I was asked "player 1"; to create such time frame to invade outposts of 2nd and 3rd. The idea is purely product of diplomacy. Since I am not close position to "player 1", I suggested him to organize such a movement with "Player 4 - aka Nova"
muscatred wrote:... on the other it could be seen as player 1 abusing their power to manipulate the scoring system...
If it is not allowed to manipulate "scoring system", why are we forming allies?
mathwhiz9 wrote:Like rlin said, it is a rare strategy. But it is a legit one.
I think that, as long as the two players had no contact going into the game, aka they didn’t join together to work together, then it’s okay.
mathwhiz9, You are right about it. As a player of the game, I don't think there is "multiboxing" issue.